[Oberon] Re (2): Re (2): Remaining priorities for documentation of ETHNO
dukeofperl at ml1.net
Sat Jul 2 03:00:08 CEST 2011
On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 17:27:12 -0800
<peasthope at shaw.ca> wrote:
> > > Seems my first contribution might be a glossary of terms in
> > > the Native.Tool. Any criticisms or better ideas?
> > Very good idea! Should have been done by ETH a long time ago,
> > IMO.
> Ideally, yes; but most of the work on ETHNO that we use, was
> done by graduate students. We can't expect to receive an
> absolutely complete and bug free system for what we paid.
Maybe so! However, after all these years having a decent set of
docs available would have been one of Oberon's best advocates. It
could have come from the community at large, and overseen by ETH -
like the successful Linux family.
Anyway, I don't want to get into a long discussion with you here! I
glad to see that someone with a modicum of NO/LNO experience has
finally found time to do this. I'm sure that it will be well
More information about the Oberon