[Oberon] FPGA Oberon some news and a reply to F.P.
private at claudio.ch
Wed Mar 5 15:44:48 CET 2014
> Yes you are right. We should have stuck to Cobol and Fortran. All the
> successors were just useless inventions
The successors of COBOL where not useless, because we write programs everyday using those successors.
But a successor to an assembly language is useless because you never use it, you use some high-level language like Oberon to write programs. Or do you plan to abandon Oberon and program your FPGA-RISC5 in assembly?
Claudio Nieder, Talweg 6, CH-8610 Uster, Tel +4179 357 6743, www.claudio.ch
More information about the Oberon