[Oberon] FPGA Oberon some news and a reply to F.P.

[Claudio Nieder]

Hi,

> Yes you are right. We should have stuck to Cobol and Fortran. All the 
> successors were just useless inventions 

The successors of COBOL where not useless, because we write programs everyday using those successors.

But a successor to an assembly language is useless because you never use it, you use some high-level language like Oberon to write programs. Or do you plan to abandon Oberon and program your FPGA-RISC5 in assembly?

claudio
-- 
Claudio Nieder, Talweg 6, CH-8610 Uster, Tel +4179 357 6743, www.claudio.ch