[Oberon] Clarifying type compatibility in Oberon-07
andreas_pirklbauer at yahoo.com
Sun Oct 8 07:17:39 CEST 2017
EDIT: "boils down" to instead of “boils"
ADDITION: There probably is no one “right” answer that suits everyone’s needs (or tastes..), otherwise it would surely have been found in the past 50+ years.. it hasn’t.
> On 08 Oct 2017, at 07:12, Andreas Pirklbauer <andreas_pirklbauer at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Sun Oct 8 02:26:53 CEST 2017 Chris Burrows wrote:
> > If the programmer has chosen to use anonymous arrays it might well be reasonable to assume
> > he is not concerned about name equivalence so why should he be inconvenienced but prohibiting
> > assignments? Surely not just because it conflicts with somebody else's personal taste?
> It all boils to the question of whether we view the text “ARRAY 10 OF INTEGER” in an anonymous array declaration as
> a) a name in its own right
> b) a name with a parameter 10
> c) not a name (anonymous entity)
> Different programmers will have different points of views on this.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Oberon