[Oberon] Clarifying type compatibility in Oberon-07
    August Karlstrom 
    fusionfile at gmail.com
       
    Sun Oct  8 09:09:36 CEST 2017
    
    
  
On 2017-10-08 07:26, Jörg wrote:
> Or: to be extremely consequent(!!) A PROCEDURE (especially those to be 
> used as variables) should get a named TYPE. Something like
> 
> PROCEDURE myDot = DotType; (* totally new syntax *)
This would be problematic if you want to use an existing procedure, like 
Math.sin in .e.g. Integral(Math.sin, 0.0, Math.pi).
-- August
    
    
More information about the Oberon
mailing list