[Oberon] byte vs. octet.
John R. Strohm
strohm at airmail.net
Fri Apr 27 03:41:40 CEST 2018
--- peter at easthope.ca wrote:
> From: <peter at easthope.ca>
> To: <oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch>
> Subject: [Oberon] byte vs. octet.
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:02:26 -0700
> Various computing related documents, including some Oberon documents
> use "octet" rather than "byte". Appears the terms are synonymous.
> Use of octet in computing is newer than byte? Is either term better
> or preferable?
Back in the Dark Ages, "byte" did not mean "8 bits". It meant "the smallest uniquely-addressable unit of storage". 6 bits was not unusual. 12 bits was not unheard-of. 8 bits happened. The venerable DEC-10 had variable-length byte load and store instructions, which came in handy for dealing with 7-bit bytes packed in a 36-bit word.
When the ARPAnet work started, BBN chose to do everything in 8-bit chunks, and they needed a word that specifically meant 8 bits. They chose "octet".
I first saw the word in the original Internet Protocol Handbook, ca. 1977 or so.
--John R. Strohm
More information about the Oberon