[Oberon] Slim binaries / OMI / Juice implementation details availability

[Jörg]

What is the difference of Javascriprt running in a browser, webassembly running in a browser or RISC-5 running in a browser? (Yes, Project Oberon runs in a browser)

Jörg

> Am 29.08.2018 um 20:53 schrieb Peter Matthias <PeterMatthias at web.de>:
> 
> 
> 
>> Am 29.08.2018 um 20:24 schrieb Jörg:
>> Like the Java classes can run in any JVM. The goal of SlimBinary to distribute executables that can run anywhere  is somewhat reached, isn‘t it?
> 
> NACK.
> The goal of OMI is to run code everywhere in native speed. While native speed today is mostly not needed, it is still a legitimate goal. Security is an other goal today. Nowadays webassembly makes OMI superfluous, IMO.
> 
> Peter
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon