[Oberon] LolaCreator: a Lola-2 IDE based on Qt Creator
paulreed at paddedcell.com
Fri Mar 22 12:13:08 CET 2019
> I would not recommend to sidestep the synthesis tool. The question
> would then be: who would do the logic minimizations/optimizations and
> the technology mapping? These things would then have to be implemented
> in the Lola compiler.
Sure but it depends what you want to do - I'm in favour of a much more
predictable and understandable, reliable tool and not too bothered about
nth-degree fancy optimisations, which in a sense are less relevant the
bigger FPGAs get. Also mapping is not too difficult in the FPGAs
targeted by the open-source tools.
The insanity of a small change to design source causing a large
unpredictable change to the output was wrestled to the ground in
software some time ago, and now you have a choice; but the hardware
tools have yet to mature in this area.
However, I know I'm in the minority in wanting simple, predictable tools
More information about the Oberon