[Oberon] Portability of Project Oberon
andreas_pirklbauer at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 8 21:04:57 CET 2020
> >Your effort of collecting all low level values and document them in one file is appreciated.
> [...] Who is going to use what I have done? The collection was released 10 months ago.
> > But ONE big SysDef.Mod is NOT a good idea.
> I agree. Remembering your advice I wrote "file or files". My proposition is that cleanup is much needed.
> The details are less important. I am not standing behind a single file, or a name SysDef.
I’d probably consider using those Def files in Extended Oberon, if only the one large SysDef.Mod file
were split into several smaller ones, as Jörg had suggested, e.g. DevDef, RegDef, MemDef, etc. It
would have to be a sensible choice though, which minimizes recompilations of one of them changes.
But one big SysDef file is a no-go. An import (which has a key) is NOT an include file used in C.
More information about the Oberon