[Barrelfish-users] Running ARM Barrelfish on Gem5

Timothy Roscoe troscoe at inf.ethz.ch
Thu Oct 4 12:22:31 CEST 2012

A wild and crazy idea: physical RAM starts at 0x80000000 on the 
OMAP4460, but at 0x0 on some GEM5 configurations.  Perhaps the GEM5 code 
is using the wrong base address for RAM.

  -- Mothy

On 10/04/2012 12:18 PM, Kornilios Kourtis wrote:
> Hi Zeus,
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 10:50:42AM +0100, Zeus Gómez Marmolejo wrote:
>> Thanks for you help, but I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong. I
>> pulled the new version today and I continue getting the same error:
>> kernel PANIC! kernel assertion "limit > start" failed at
>> ../../bf/kernel/arch/ arm/phys_mmap.c:130
>> Gem5 has been checked out on the specified version and patched
>> accordingly.  Would it be possible to get the specific revision on
>> which Barrelfish ARMv7 was booting on Gem5?
> I am not sure about the specific revision, but by looking at the tree
> history, the following revisions look like good starting points:
> - ba3cc81ca058 (r1087)
> - 48a8bffc03d1 (r1082)
> cheers,
> Kornilios.

More information about the Barrelfish-users mailing list