Re (2): [Oberon] Native Oberon on sourceforge
edgar at edgarschwarz.de
edgar at edgarschwarz.de
Tue Mar 21 23:40:37 CET 2006
jan at verhoeven272.nl schrieb:
> Op Tuesday 21 March 2006 10:21 schreef Treutwein Bernhard:
> > The project is here:
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/nativeoberon
I just had a look an it seems like sourveforge is still uses CVS.
For the time being you can put small stuff on the wiki.
http://www.edgar-schwarz.de/mm/OberonContributions
And if you perhaps can't access the domain: There are some filters out there
which say it's porn. Probably because months ago somebody uploaded porn links
to my wiki. I deleted them and removed the unregistered write access then.
But it seems that it's "once porn, forever porn". I sent a mail now and try
to get a reevaluation of my domain. Or at least to learn what they found
for this categorization.
I also wonder how much Google e.g. filters already without telling us.
I read some unsettling stuff about Google toolbar publishing local contents without
asking.
> > The project's home page:
> > http://nativeoberon.sourceforge.net/
> I'm willing to donate a 50 MB hosted website plus domainname if that is
> better for us.
I have a virtual server now at www.edgar-schwarz.de. It's running apache2.
Atm I'm trying to install Subversion (Still missing some libraries for the
apache plugin working). When Subversion is working I can check my WebDAV/DeltaV
client with it. Subversion also uses parts of the protocol.
At least the basic stuff for versioning single files. Concerning advanced
versioning they choose to implement a different subset than me.
Using Subversion as repository would guarantee better data security compared
to a server written by a single person (Me :-)
Cheers, Edgar
More information about the Oberon
mailing list