[Oberon] Re (2): Current Oberon System

[Aubrey.McIntosh at Alumni.UTexas.Net]

My interests went in another direction.  I still think the FeRAM was a good
choice.  I think it had some write cycle limitations, I remember being
cautious about the stack location.  It seems likely that this has improved
in the past 10 years.

Are you thinking about laying out a board?


On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 5:34 PM, <peasthope at shaw.ca> wrote:

> From:   Chris Burrows <chris at cfbsoftware.com>
> Date:   Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:01:26 +1030
> > ... with as little as a total of 8K of RAM for data and 32K of Flash ROM
> for storing
> > their programs.
>
> What about 32 K of FeRAM and no Flash storage?  Ever used FeRAM?
>
> >From Aubrey.McIntosh at Alumni.UTexas.Net  Fri Nov  2 16:20:40 2012
> Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:20:40 -0500
> In about 2000, I used F-RAM on a motorola 68HC11 evaluation board.
>
> Any technical obstacles preventing further use of FeRAM?  Your
> interests went another direction?
>
> Thanks,              ... Peter E.
>
> --
> 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
> Tel +13606390202  Bcc: peasthope at shaw.ca  http://carnot.yi.org/
> "http://members.shaw.ca/peasthope/index.html#Itinerary "
>
>
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
>



-- 
Aubrey McIntosh, Ph.D.
211 E. 5th St.
Morris MN 56267
(512)-348-7401
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/oberon/attachments/20121217/c8e13781/attachment.html