[Oberon] objects and jewels

[Frans-Pieter Vonck]

>adequate explanation via minimum words.
Luckily the ARMs nowadays come with plenty of memory.

Greets,
F.P.



Greets,F.P.

> This sounds interesting.
> Is a 'pin' a hardware-connector-pin?
> Is 'the modular way' of 'controlling a pin':
>    latching the corresponding outport via the corresponding native machine
> code?
>
> This thread could be chance a to exercise Wirthian adequate explanation via
> minimum words.
>
>
> On 2/18/13, Frans-Pieter Vonck <fp at vonck.nl> wrote:
>> Hi Oberoneurs,
>>
>> I try to "reverse engineer" the arduino language in Oberon07.
>> In arduino speak you create an servo object like this:
>> <code>
>> Servo myservo;  // create servo object to control a servo
>>
>> void setup()
>> {
>>   myservo.attach(9);  // attaches the servo on pin 9 to the servo object
>> }
>> </code>
>>
>> In oberon(07) this would become something like:
>> MODULE Example
>> IMPORT SERVO;
>> VAR myservo : SERVO.servo;
>>
>> BEGIN
>>   SERVO.Init(myservo,9)
>> END Example
>>
>> I remember reading an argument of Wirth against object orientation.
However
>> the object way, "myservo.atttach(9)" seems more elegant than the
modular way. Did I overlook something?
>>
>> Greets,
>> Frans-Pieter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related
systems https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
>>
>