[Oberon] Treatment of parameter-less procedure type in ORP.Mod.txt
Srinivas Nayak
sinu.nayak2001 at gmail.com
Sun Jul 10 14:23:25 CEST 2016
I think, if we remove 0 filling from NEW, many such hidden cases would come out...
With thanks and best regards,
Yours sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak
Home: http://www.mathmeth.com/sn/
Blog: http://srinivas-nayak.blogspot.in/
On 07/10/2016 11:39 AM, Jörg Straube wrote:
> You're right.
> The statement "ptype.nofpar := nofpar" should be taken out of the IF and be put just before the end of the procedure.
> But luckily, ptype is filled with 0 by NEW :-)
>
> Jörg
>
>> Am 09.07.2016 um 14:55 schrieb Srinivas Nayak <sinu.nayak2001 at gmail.com>:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I think ORP.Mod.txt missed to make
>> ptype.nofpar := 0; in PROCEDURE ProcedureType()
>> for parameter-less procedure types...
>>
>> Such as:
>>
>> TYPE Command* = PROCEDURE;
>> BEGIN
>> body (*initialize module*)
>> END
>>
>>
>> Not sure how Oberon compiler manages to get nofpar = 0!
>> Or, I am missing it somewhere?
>> Or, is there a chance of any memory chunk pre-initialized to 0 in Oberon?
>>
>>
>>
>> With thanks and best regards,
>>
>> Yours sincerely,
>> Srinivas Nayak
>>
>> Home: http://www.mathmeth.com/sn/
>> Blog: http://srinivas-nayak.blogspot.in/
>> --
>> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
>> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
>
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
>
More information about the Oberon
mailing list