[Oberon] Oberon for a C++ user.

[Skulski, Wojciech]

Ideally, we need Component Pascal. It was the best of the Oberon family so far.

W.
________________________________________
From: Oberon [oberon-bounces at lists.inf.ethz.ch] on behalf of Serge Durmanov [serge.durmanov at yandex.ru]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 8:10 AM
To: ETH Oberon and related systems
Subject: Re: [Oberon] Oberon for a C++ user.

27.09.2016, 23:11, "Felix Friedrich" <felix.friedrich at inf.ethz.ch>:
...
> Let me first of all confess that I like Oberon-2 a lot. I always thought
> it would be a good idea to reintroduce the type bound procedures on
> value types in Active Oberon. [Most important difference to Active
> Oberon in this context: methods can be defined outside the scope of an
> object, methods can be defined on records, not only pointer to records.]
>...
Hi, Felix.

Hi, Felix.
Are there any changes to the language in this plan?
We need not reference types that have the methods that adds to the convenience in the design and simplifies the code. I did the porting on the Active Oberon AGG lib, and lacked methods on the records, and I make a separate module (one record type - one module), but it is not convenient and not possible to do polymorphism. I go back to classic Oberon and use procedural variables in records. But ...it is the sundown manually

Serge