[Oberon] Modulus on negative number
Jörg
joerg.straube at iaeth.ch
Mon May 15 09:57:08 CEST 2017
It is. MOD is defined as C x C -> C
Jörg
> Am 14.05.2017 um 20:17 schrieb Aubrey McIntosh <aubrey.mcintosh at utexas.edu>:
>
> I have not checked my number theory book lately, but I don't think (i.e., don't remember) that it is defined mathematically for negative divisors either.
>
>> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 3:12 AM, Peter Matthias <PeterMatthias at web.de> wrote:
>> Agreed. However, -1 MOD -12 or 1 MOD -12 is not defined in Oberon.
>>
>>
>>> Am 12.05.2017 um 22:43 schrieb Aubrey McIntosh:
>>> for -1 MOD 12, the mathematically correct answers which are consistent
>>> with the language report, are
>>> q=-1, r=11.
>>>
>>> This definition works very well, for example, to implement wrap around
>>> strip chart displays.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Peter Matthias <PeterMatthias at web.de
>>> <mailto:PeterMatthias at web.de>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Warming up the thread to give supposedly correct answer:
>>>
>>> Am 16.02.2017 um 00:00 schrieb Peter Matthias:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 15.02.2017 um 04:21 schrieb Srinivas Nayak:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> Recently I come across modulus on a negative number.
>>> Will it produce a negative number or positive?
>>> Someone says both are correct!
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/a/4403556
>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/a/4403556>
>>> Which one is mathematically correct?
>>> Surprisingly different languages calculate it differently even!
>>> What is Oberon's way?
>>>
>>>
>>> The theory was already answered. In practice, all compiler
>>> implementations I used (native X86, Shark, MIPS), give wrong
>>> result when
>>> both, divident and divisor are negative. I fixed it just
>>> yesterday for
>>> all non x86 versions.
>>>
>>>
>>> I should have read the language report before making such claims.
>>>
>>> Oberon Report says:
>>>
>>> "The operators DIV and MOD apply to integer operands only. They are
>>> related by the following formulas defined for any dividend x and
>>> positive divisors y:
>>> x = (x DIV y) * y + (x MOD y)
>>> 0 ≤ (x MOD y) < y"
>>>
>>> Oberon07-Report says:
>>>
>>> "The operators DIV and MOD apply to integer operands only. Let q = x
>>> DIV y, and r = x MOD y.
>>> Then quotient q and remainder r are defined by the equation
>>> x = q*y + r 0 <= r < y"
>>>
>>> Last statement obviously cannot be met if y is negative.
>>>
>>> So in short: Don't use DIV/MOD for negative divisors as the result
>>> is not defined.
>>>
>>> >From the implemtation point of view this perfectly makes sense as
>>> negative divisors are seldom used and correction for DIV of the
>>> usually stupid hardware implementation only takes 3 additional
>>> instructions compared to at least 6 for a complete definition.
>>> Simple SHIFT/AND instructions for power of 2 divisors easily
>>> outwight these 3 additional instructions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> --
>>> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch <mailto:Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch> mailing
>>> list for ETH Oberon and related systems
>>> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
>>> <https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Aubrey McIntosh, Ph.D.
>>> 1502 Devon Circle
>>> Austin TX 78723
>>> (512) 348-7401
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
>>> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
>>>
>> --
>> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
>> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
>
>
>
> --
> Aubrey McIntosh, Ph.D.
> 1502 Devon Circle
> Austin TX 78723
> (512) 348-7401
>
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/oberon/attachments/20170515/4c872f79/attachment.html>
More information about the Oberon
mailing list