[Oberon] Re (2): Software Tracking Project
Jörg Straube
joerg.straube at iaeth.ch
Wed Jan 31 10:24:46 CET 2018
For ProjectOberon, I decided to try adding the V4 extension to Texts:TextFrames instead of porting the whole S3 Objects to ProjectOberon.
Jörg
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 31.01.2018 um 10:01 schrieb Treutwein Bernhard <Bernhard.Treutwein at Verwaltung.Uni-Muenchen.DE>:
>>> Aim to incorporate the best of S3 and V4 into V5?
>>
>
> I think it would be worth any effort
>
>> V5 was an (in)official name of the 2013 FPGA Oberon System.
>>
>
> the name is not too important.
>
> Several good points have been raised in the discussion, but
> Imho, the comparison to Linux fails. It is more like the
> KDE/Gnome concurrency, but with the addition that
> S3 changed the kernel system calls (persistent object
> support implemented in the kernel) whereas V4 extended
> for the same purpose the character set. The split KDE/Gnome
> is on a higher level but would have been similar, if Qt not
> only introduced an object/message handling layer in C
> but would have implemented the support for it in the
> Linux kernel.
>
> BTW, Ivan Denisovs nice diagram (thanks Chris) is a little bit
> misleading: S3 is a descendant of V2 and should be in
> parallel to V4. And more: S3 is is not a dead end (as it
> appears in the diagram, but developed together with yet
> another Oberon language dialect (Active Oberon) into
> AOS/BlueBottle/A2 ...
>
> I am not sure if V4 can run on top of the S3 kernel, but I think
> it is worth a try.
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
More information about the Oberon
mailing list