[Oberon] NEW with anonymous records

[Diego Sardina]

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018, at 10:03 PM, Andreas Pirklbauer wrote:
> 
> Nope. The code to restrict pointers to *named*
> records was indeed added in September 2017,
> as stated earlier. I know so because I wrote it..
> 

The goal of that code is to warn about an implementation limit.

Usually Wirth writes ".. not implemented", he just applied your
patch without caring much about the message.

Except if you have an explicit answer by him that pointers must
point to named records.