On 11/7/18, Andreas Pirklbauer <andreas_pirklbauer at yahoo.com> wrote: > Another reason is the desire to make the Oberon-2 compiler implement > a superset of Revised Oberon (Oberon-07) - not the original Oberon > language as defined in the 1988/1990. So the so-called "planned Oberon-2 compiler" is, by definition, *not* an Oberon-2 compiler?