[Oberon] Easter eggs in Oberon

[Chris Burrows]

Nobody forbids you state that equivalence but as it is not stated in the report it is an assumption you have made. Such an equivalence would make no practical sense to me. Why would it be necessary to have a separate DIV operator if it were true? 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oberon [mailto:oberon-bounces at lists.inf.ethz.ch] On Behalf Of Joerg
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 April 2020 4:50 AM
> To: ETH Oberon and related systems
> Subject: Re: [Oberon] Easter eggs in Oberon
> 
> August
> 
> Where is defined what the operator / shall do?
> I mean who does forbid me to state / is equal to DIV if both operands are
> INTEGER.
> 
> br
> J rg
>