[Oberon] Multiple RETURN in a procedure

Ivan Denisov d.ivan.krsk at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 09:59:18 CEST 2022

Significant gain is in the fixation of intellectual gains of IT-science. 
The last Oberon is a peace of science, and this point of view put things 
at their places.


24.10.2022 03:23, Skulski, Wojciech пишет:
> Ivan:
>> So, I will cite N. Wirth document, how he eliminated RETURN.
>> "Now the result specification becomes syntactically a part of the procedure declaration, and
>> vanishes as an independent statement form."
> It sounds like a very abstract view. Hard to disagree, and hard to appreciate either. I repeat my question: what are those significant gains of breaking lots of code?
> Wojtek
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch  mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/oberon/attachments/20221024/9d47d07b/attachment.html>

More information about the Oberon mailing list