[Oberon] Oberon language family and the master.

[Christian Demmer]

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 20:24:18 +0530, Srinivas Nayak wrote:
> So today, can we say, whatever is present in Oberon-7 is time tested;
> and one doesn't need to add or remove anything from it;
> and this is the state-of-the-art;
> and is simple but not simpler?

> If so, one wouldn't worry about
> Oberon V,
> Oberon X,
> Active Oberon,
> Action Oberon,
> Object Oberon,
> Concurrent Oberon
> etc. etc.

I personally would not agree. Oberon-07 is just the version of Oberon 
that fits best with Project Oberon 2013 edition. Beyond that and some 
embedded applications (Astrobe) I do not know of any further 
application. Oberon for the classic Oberon system and Oberon-2 and 
Active Oberon appear of much wider use.

But it all depends on your needs. So, what is the intention of your 
question?

Greetings, chris