[Oberon] NEW with anonymous records

Diego Sardina dsar at eml.cc
Tue Feb 20 22:32:29 CET 2018

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018, at 10:03 PM, Andreas Pirklbauer wrote:
> Nope. The code to restrict pointers to *named*
> records was indeed added in September 2017,
> as stated earlier. I know so because I wrote it..

The goal of that code is to warn about an implementation limit.

Usually Wirth writes ".. not implemented", he just applied your
patch without caring much about the message.

Except if you have an explicit answer by him that pointers must
point to named records.

More information about the Oberon mailing list