[Barrelfish-users] Building newest BF

[Stefan Kästle]

This is the patch:

changeset:   929:0030cd9fb3e6
user:        Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt at inf.ethz.ch>
date:        Tue Jun 12 17:40:30 2012 +0200
summary:     hake/Config.hs.template: switch optimization level back to -O2

diff -r 689e89ab292c -r 0030cd9fb3e6 hake/Config.hs.template
--- a/hake/Config.hs.template   Mon Jun 11 09:46:36 2012 +0200
+++ b/hake/Config.hs.template   Tue Jun 12 17:40:30 2012 +0200
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@

  -- Optimisation flags (-Ox -g etc.) passed to compiler
  cOptFlags :: String
-cOptFlags = "-g -O3"
+cOptFlags = "-g -O2"

  -- Selects which libc to compile with, "oldc" or "newlib"
  libc :: String

Don't forget to either create a new build directory or remove Config.hs 
from your current build directory as updating it in the source directory 
will not overwrite the version in your build directory.


On 06/29/2012 04:40 PM, Patrik Eklöf wrote:
> Thanks.
> That removed one error, but as soon as that finished, another popped up:
>
> [root at localhost build]# make
> gcc -std=c99 -U__STRICT_ANSI__ -Wstrict-prototypes 
> -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-omit-frame-pointer 
> -fno-builtin -nostdinc -U__linux__ -Ulinux -Wall -Wshadow 
> -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wredundant-decls 
> -Werror -imacros ../source/include/deputy/nodeputy.h -m64 
> -mno-red-zone -fPIE -fno-stack-protector -Wno-unused-but-set-variable 
> -Wno-packed-bitfield-compat -DBARRELFISH -DCONFIG_LAZY_THC 
> -DCONFIG_NEWLIB -DUSE_KALUGA_DVM -DCONFIG_INTERCONNECT_DRIVER_LMP 
> -DCONFIG_INTERCONNECT_DRIVER_UMP -DCONFIG_INTERCONNECT_DRIVER_MULTIHOP 
> -DCONFIG_FLOUNDER_BACKEND_LMP -DCONFIG_FLOUNDER_BACKEND_UMP 
> -DCONFIG_FLOUNDER_BACKEND_MULTIHOP -g -O3 -I../source/include 
> -I../source/include/arch/x86_64 
> -I../source/lib/newlib/newlib/libc/include -I../source/include/c 
> -I../source/include/target/x86_64 -I../source/include/ipv4 
> -I../source/include/posixcompat -I./x86_64/include 
> -I./x86_64/include/dev -I../source/usr/tests/thctest 
> -I./x86_64/usr/tests/thctest -o 
> ./x86_64/usr/tests/thctest/_for_app_thctest/thctest.o -c 
> ../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c
> ../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c: Assembler messages:
> ../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:53: Error: symbol 
> `_thc_cont_return_5' is already defined
> ../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:69: Error: symbol 
> `_thc_cont_return_6' is already defined
> ../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:91: Error: symbol 
> `_thc_cont_return_7' is already defined
> ../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:111: Error: symbol 
> `_thc_cont_return_8' is already defined
> make: *** [x86_64/usr/tests/thctest/_for_app_thctest/thctest.o] Error 1
>
> Also, I did test this on a fresh clone of the repo (using rev 923).
> Multiple definition errors... but where do they come from?
>
> Regards,
> Patrik Eklöf
> Student at ICT, Master of Science in Engineering Education, IT 
> Programme, KTH, Kista
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Raphael Fuchs [raphaelfuchs at student.ethz.ch]
> *Sent:* Friday, June 29, 2012 13:30
> *To:* barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch
> *Subject:* Re: [Barrelfish-users] Building newest BF
>
> Hi Patrik
>
> We already fixed this bug in our development tree, the fix will be 
> included in our next release. Meanwhile, you can apply the attached 
> patch yourself, it should solve your problem.
>
> Regards
> Raphael
>
> On 29.06.2012 12:42, Patrik Eklöf wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm having trouble building the newest rev of BF.
>> I've tried the newest as well as the stable 922 rev, but both give 
>> the same error.
>>
>> The complete error is:
>> ../source/include/acpi_client/acpi_client.h:19:36: fatal error: 
>> if/acpi_rpcclient_defs.h: No such file or directory
>>
>> I've tried downloading the source from scratch, then applying the 
>> patch at http://wiki.barrelfish.org/Getting_Started 
>> <http://wiki.barrelfish.org/Getting_Started> (because otherwise I get 
>> the dreaded Hake error), then running the hake script and finally make.
>>
>> I've updated all packages to latest, but still running on the 3.1 
>> kernel to see if it would help the issue, but it did not.
>> Any idea what's wrong?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Patrik Eklöf
>> Student at ICT, Master of Science in Engineering Education, IT 
>> Programme, KTH, Kista
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Barrelfish-users mailing list
>> Barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch
>> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/barrelfish-users
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Barrelfish-users mailing list
> Barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/barrelfish-users

-- 
Stefan



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/barrelfish-users/attachments/20120629/fb7c8304/attachment.html