[Barrelfish-users] Building newest BF

[Patrik Eklöf]

Yeah, already fixed that. Thanks.
Still, considering rev 923 is the one for the latest stable release, I am wondering why there are so many problems with it.
I mean, it should compile without problems, just as with the last release, shouldn't it? Unless there is some page about various problems I am missing.
Is there going to be any more problems compiling this rev?

Regards,
Patrik Eklöf
Student at ICT, Master of Science in Engineering Education, IT Programme, KTH, Kista
________________________________
From: Stefan Kästle [stefan.kaestle at inf.ethz.ch]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 16:46
To: barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch
Subject: Re: [Barrelfish-users] Building newest BF

This is the patch:

changeset:   929:0030cd9fb3e6
user:        Kornilios Kourtis <kkourt at inf.ethz.ch><mailto:kkourt at inf.ethz.ch>
date:        Tue Jun 12 17:40:30 2012 +0200
summary:     hake/Config.hs.template: switch optimization level back to -O2

diff -r 689e89ab292c -r 0030cd9fb3e6 hake/Config.hs.template
--- a/hake/Config.hs.template   Mon Jun 11 09:46:36 2012 +0200
+++ b/hake/Config.hs.template   Tue Jun 12 17:40:30 2012 +0200
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@

 -- Optimisation flags (-Ox -g etc.) passed to compiler
 cOptFlags :: String
-cOptFlags = "-g -O3"
+cOptFlags = "-g -O2"

 -- Selects which libc to compile with, "oldc" or "newlib"
 libc :: String

Don't forget to either create a new build directory or remove Config.hs from your current build directory as updating it in the source directory will not overwrite the version in your build directory.


On 06/29/2012 04:40 PM, Patrik Eklöf wrote:
Thanks.
That removed one error, but as soon as that finished, another popped up:

[root at localhost build]# make
gcc -std=c99 -U__STRICT_ANSI__ -Wstrict-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin -nostdinc -U__linux__ -Ulinux -Wall -Wshadow -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wredundant-decls -Werror -imacros ../source/include/deputy/nodeputy.h -m64 -mno-red-zone -fPIE -fno-stack-protector -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-packed-bitfield-compat -DBARRELFISH -DCONFIG_LAZY_THC -DCONFIG_NEWLIB -DUSE_KALUGA_DVM -DCONFIG_INTERCONNECT_DRIVER_LMP -DCONFIG_INTERCONNECT_DRIVER_UMP -DCONFIG_INTERCONNECT_DRIVER_MULTIHOP -DCONFIG_FLOUNDER_BACKEND_LMP -DCONFIG_FLOUNDER_BACKEND_UMP -DCONFIG_FLOUNDER_BACKEND_MULTIHOP -g -O3 -I../source/include -I../source/include/arch/x86_64 -I../source/lib/newlib/newlib/libc/include -I../source/include/c -I../source/include/target/x86_64 -I../source/include/ipv4 -I../source/include/posixcompat -I./x86_64/include -I./x86_64/include/dev -I../source/usr/tests/thctest -I./x86_64/usr/tests/thctest -o ./x86_64/usr/tests/thctest/_for_app_thctest/thctest.o -c ../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c
../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c: Assembler messages:
../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:53: Error: symbol `_thc_cont_return_5' is already defined
../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:69: Error: symbol `_thc_cont_return_6' is already defined
../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:91: Error: symbol `_thc_cont_return_7' is already defined
../source/usr/tests/thctest/thctest.c:111: Error: symbol `_thc_cont_return_8' is already defined
make: *** [x86_64/usr/tests/thctest/_for_app_thctest/thctest.o] Error 1

Also, I did test this on a fresh clone of the repo (using rev 923).
Multiple definition errors... but where do they come from?

Regards,
Patrik Eklöf
Student at ICT, Master of Science in Engineering Education, IT Programme, KTH, Kista
________________________________
From: Raphael Fuchs [raphaelfuchs at student.ethz.ch<mailto:raphaelfuchs at student.ethz.ch>]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 13:30
To: barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch<mailto:barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch>
Subject: Re: [Barrelfish-users] Building newest BF

Hi Patrik

We already fixed this bug in our development tree, the fix will be included in our next release. Meanwhile, you can apply the attached patch yourself, it should solve your problem.

Regards
Raphael

On 29.06.2012 12:42, Patrik Eklöf wrote:
Hi all,

I'm having trouble building the newest rev of BF.
I've tried the newest as well as the stable 922 rev, but both give the same error.

The complete error is:
../source/include/acpi_client/acpi_client.h:19:36: fatal error: if/acpi_rpcclient_defs.h: No such file or directory

I've tried downloading the source from scratch, then applying the patch at http://wiki.barrelfish.org/Getting_Started (because otherwise I get the dreaded Hake error), then running the hake script and finally make.

I've updated all packages to latest, but still running on the 3.1 kernel to see if it would help the issue, but it did not.
Any idea what's wrong?

Regards,
Patrik Eklöf
Student at ICT, Master of Science in Engineering Education, IT Programme, KTH, Kista



_______________________________________________
Barrelfish-users mailing list
Barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch<mailto:Barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch>
https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/barrelfish-users






_______________________________________________
Barrelfish-users mailing list
Barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch<mailto:Barrelfish-users at lists.inf.ethz.ch>
https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/barrelfish-users



--
Stefan


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/barrelfish-users/attachments/20120629/c9703bb1/attachment-0001.html