[Oberon] FPGA - SRAM vs. BRAM
Jörg
joerg.straube at iaeth.ch
Fri Apr 24 17:27:00 CEST 2015
Sorry. I was wrong: PO-2013 needs 1 MB = 8 Mbits.
Unfortunately, still too much for the LX45 :-(
Jörg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jörg [mailto:joerg.straube at iaeth.ch]
Sent: Freitag, 24. April 2015 17:09
To: 'ETH Oberon and related systems'
Subject: RE: [Oberon] FPGA - SRAM vs. BRAM
Hi Bernhard
Principally, I guess this is possible.
The description says:
"The Block Memory Generator can generate memory structures from 1 to 4096
bits wide, and
at least two locations deep. The maximum depth of the memory is limited only
by the
number of block RAM primitives in the target device"
So for PO-2013, we would need 1M x 32 bits = 32 Mbits
Remark: PO-2013 uses BRAM already for the ROM (1K x 32 bits) to store the
Bootloader.
Unfortunately, my "target device" Spartan-6 LX45 on the Pipistrello board
only has 116 x 18 kbit = ~2 Mbit :-(
br
Jörg
-----Original Message-----
From: Treutwein Bernhard
[mailto:Bernhard.Treutwein at Verwaltung.Uni-Muenchen.DE]
Sent: Donnerstag, 23. April 2015 14:48
To: 'oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch'
Subject: [Oberon] FPGA - SRAM vs. BRAM
I found the following documentation about generating BRAM in Spartan-6
devices
http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/ip_documentation/blk_mem_gen/v7_
2/pg058-blk-mem-gen.pdf which appears to be an alternative to using SRAM.
What about using it for PO-2013?
--
Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4847 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/oberon/attachments/20150424/b28593aa/attachment.bin
More information about the Oberon
mailing list