[Oberon] Wikibook _versus_ svn or git.

[Jörg Straube]

I would appreciate a repository of ProjectOberon, where the community can contribute instead of having independent forks.

Perhaps even with some approvers to review the contributions to guarantee a minimal level of quality...

In my point of view, WikiBook doesn't seem to be the best choice for this task.

Jörg

> Am 20.04.2016 um 17:11 schrieb <peter at easthope.ca> <peter at easthope.ca>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A small discussion about the possibility of a wikibook 
> for the sources for the Oberon system is here.
> https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikibooks_talk:What_is_Wikibooks#The_source_code_of_a_computer_operating_system
> 
> I began the discussion out of interest.  Certainly I 
> don't claim to have any convincing answer or solution. 
> Comments here or on the Wikibook page are more than welcome.
> 
> Thanks,            ... Lyall E.
> 
> -- 
> 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 123456789 12
> Tel +1 360 639 0202 
> http://easthope.ca/Peter.html Bcc: peter at easthope. ca
> 
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2380 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/oberon/attachments/20160420/262bf495/attachment.p7s>