[Oberon] Methods for Record ( Active Oberon )

[Serge Durmanov]

No, my interests - A2 and ActiveOberon

26.10.2016, 19:05, "Skulski, Wojciech" <skulski at pas.rochester.edu>:
> Ideally, we need Component Pascal. It was the best of the Oberon family so far.
>
> W.
> ________________________________________
> From: Oberon [oberon-bounces at lists.inf.ethz.ch] on behalf of Serge Durmanov [serge.durmanov at yandex.ru]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 8:10 AM
> To: ETH Oberon and related systems
> Subject: Re: [Oberon] Oberon for a C++ user.
>
> 27.09.2016, 23:11, "Felix Friedrich" <felix.friedrich at inf.ethz.ch>:
> ...
>>  Let me first of all confess that I like Oberon-2 a lot. I always thought
>>  it would be a good idea to reintroduce the type bound procedures on
>>  value types in Active Oberon. [Most important difference to Active
>>  Oberon in this context: methods can be defined outside the scope of an
>>  object, methods can be defined on records, not only pointer to records.]
>> ...
>
>
> Hi, Felix.
> Are there any changes to the language in this plan?
> We need not reference types that have the methods that adds to the convenience in the design and simplifies the code. I did the porting on the Active Oberon AGG lib, and lacked methods on the records, and I make a separate module (one record type - one module), but it is not convenient and not possible to do polymorphism. I go back to classic Oberon and use procedural variables in records. But ...it is the sundown manually
>
> Serge
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon