[Oberon] QEMU target implementation for Oberon RISC architecture

[Michael Schierl]

Hello,


Am 31.12.2019 um 10:31 schrieb Jörg:
> Just to refine my idea. The *second* byte of the MOV’ instruction could
> identify the emulator as follows:
>
>   * *P*eter de Wachter’s emulator could return     50H (ASCII “P”)
>   * *A*ndreas Pirklbauer’s emulator could return  41H (ASCII “A”)
>   * *C*huck Perkin’s emulator could return             43H (ASCII “C”)
>   * *M*ichael Schier’s emulator could return          4DH (ASCII “M”)
>   * *R*oel de Jong’s emulator could return             52H (ASCII “R”)

I don't think this will work out to identify emulators in a sensible way
(e.g. their feature set).

Chuck has done one Emulator in Go and now he is working on QEMU.

I have done one desktop emulator (in Java), and then one
feature-incompatible Web emulator in JavaScript (which I later ported to
Webassembly/AssemblyScript). And last but not least I also maintain a
fork of pdewacht's emulator (adding 16 color support, host filesystem,
rtc, and drag&drop for PCLink).

At least my 3 emulators have different feature sets, so I could not
think of any good reason why they should get identified the same way.


Regards,


Micahel