[Oberon] Clarifying type compatibility in Oberon-07

Luca Boasso luke.boasso at gmail.com
Fri Oct 6 20:52:14 CEST 2017

I am not a strong proponent of structural equivalence, I just want the
report to be in sync with the compiler :)
So either the report should reflect the compiler's rules or vice versa.

On Oct 6, 2017 11:34, "Jörg" <joerg.straube at iaeth.ch> wrote:

>     > So I agree with Артур Ефимов, probably Wirth will update the
> language report soon.
>     I really hope that won't happen. If one wants structural equivalence
>     then there is Modula-3.
> Hopefully, he will not do it. As explained I see no good reason to do so.
> Jörg
> --
> Oberon at lists.inf.ethz.ch mailing list for ETH Oberon and related systems
> https://lists.inf.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/oberon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.inf.ethz.ch/pipermail/oberon/attachments/20171006/d9a59b15/attachment.html>

More information about the Oberon mailing list