[Oberon] Why should I investigate Blue-bottle ?
easlab at absamail.co.za
easlab at absamail.co.za
Mon Jun 7 18:31:31 CEST 2004
Compare these possible reasons to justify 'looking at NO':
1. if minimum resources are important,
2. if you have already invested knowledge in any of the algol family
languages.
3. if you collect a large volume of texts [probalbly from the inet]
which needs to be: searched, analysed, extracted, colated,
colour-clasified ..etc., in order to extract the contents/knowledge
with minimum effort.
4. if you acknowledge the loss of concentration [for rapid use] from the
conventional need to eye-scan from text-screen to key-board.
The reflex-cording-mouse becomes no more distracting than
breathing.
5. if you want open source where compilation takes seconds instead
of tens of minutes. And where the stuff is just under the surface
instead of deep inside a tree needing scripts to make Makefiles
to ........RTFMssss.
6. others ....?
What would Blue-bottle offer me ?
Will Blue-bottle solve these NO 'problems', better than existing
work-arounds:-
* every time I look at System.Directory *.Obj I see more
applications which apparently have no documentation, like
Scheme.Obj , SchemeOps.Obj which apparently relates to the
Lispy-language Scheme,
* cater for ISP ID containing unusual but not invalid per RFC
chars like "@",
* cater for Mailservers which don't immediately answer,
<Your have N mails>, as apprarently was 'common'
at one time - ie. conventional but NOT as per RFC,
* fetch: http:// * pdf , *.doc and other non-viewable formats,
I haven't yet got a work-around for this. Edgar gave me a patch
for Oberon.Text @ 'MIME' which fixed some formats,
* avoid apparent dead-end-state in PPP when connection aborts
unintendedly ?
--------
== Chris Glur.
More information about the Oberon
mailing list